Stories I read: Kabuliwala, Grandfather and Folly, in the same order of liking and recommendation. This is the in-class review I presented
for my English Literature Course for the story Folly.
Talking about Folly, Tagore’s ability to develop his characters in the fewest words possible is truly commendable.
This is evident in how he portrays the doctor, who is the protagonist of the story.
Only two lines "Inspector was enriched by my good offices, I by his" and "The love between the Inspector and the doctor was destroyed
in the storm" can give a picture about what kind of character the doctor is earlier and what he later transforms into.
Between Grandfather and Folly, I sensed a lot of similarities. The central characters of the stories have similar egoistic
personalities and they undergo a positive change in attitude as the story progresses, marked by particular turning points
in the plot line. But one thing I notice is that the character changes in grandfather are complete and too ideal to be true.
The protagonist suddenly gets down from his high horse, seemingly falls for the one woman he thought wasn't beautiful, and the
grandfather suddenly accepts that he is poor, all because of a small prank. This steals away the authenticity of the story.
Whereas, changes in the doctor are shown to be partial and more realistic.
While emotional trauma justifiably leads to a sudden change of heart, he still goes and apologises to the inspector and
pleads for forgiveness. After all, he has to do what he has to do to save his ancestral home!
Both stories are good examples of social satires. Folly mainly focuses on the societies’ obsession with wealth,
and the death of morality as a consequence of this, as well as the atrocities which the lower strata of the society
are subjected to by the rich and powerful. While grandfather dwells largely on a personal anecdote in the social context
of those times, Folly has a stronger underlying message that is relevant across societies and generations. Since Folly focuses
on social issues that are largely prevalent even with changing times, it makes the story a relatable read for everyone even today.
The changing atmosphere of the story and the emotions of the protagonist strongly reflect on a variety
of aspects of human nature parallelly: Love, friendship, empathy, sorrow, exploitation, materialism, corruption,
oppression and more, making the narrative rich with a motley of human emotions.
Cons:
The transitions in the story are abrupt. They are not subtle and smooth but like huge knots on the string. For example,
when the doctor helps Harinath, he talks about Lakshmi coming to visit him. It is unclear what he means by this.
Has he taken money from Harinath for his help? The source of the doctor’s money is left a mystery and we quickly
transition to the marriage of his daughter.
The story is also quite inconsistent in the doctor’s feelings towards his daughter. On one hand, he is sensitive to
his daughter’s feelings and does not remarry, but on the other he wants to marry her off at a very young age, his tone
suggesting he wants to get rid of this responsibility.
The portrayal of women in both stories is very superficial, despite the fact that the plot heavily depends on them.
I felt the narrative could have focused more on building the characters of the women, within the framework of the
social norms of the time.
Conclusion:
Personally, what makes any story a good read is when it stays with me even after it ends. For a
4-page story to leave an impact on me: (i) through its ability to create an attachment and understanding for the protagonist,
(ii) through evoking so many emotions in such a short span of time
and (iii) by compelling me to think more as the story draws to an end, makes this definitely worth a read.